SEC v. Ahmad Haris Tajyar and Eric Leo Marsoubian (marking the close, 2021)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Ahmad Haris Tajyar and Eric Leo Marsoubian, alleging conduct this library classifies as marking the close, matched orders and wash trading. The release records a civil penalty of $219,604, disgorgement of $15,267.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25167 |
| Date filed | 2021-08-13 |
| Date resolved | 2021-08-13 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Central District of California |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | penny stock bar |
| Defendants | Ahmad Haris Tajyar ; Eric Leo Marsoubian |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(1) ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(2) ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Marking the close , Matched orders , Wash trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $220k
- Disgorgement
- $15.3k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $235k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on August 13, 2021 as release LR-25167. The respondents named are Ahmad Haris Tajyar and Eric Leo Marsoubian (2 individuals, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California.
This library tags the matter as marking the close, matched orders and wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $219,604, disgorgement of $15,267. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
Non-monetary relief recorded: penny stock bar.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Marking the close — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Matched orders — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Wash trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2021-08-13 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEBI v. Usha Devi and others (price and volume manipulation of DU Digital Technologies, 2025) | SEBI (India) | 2025-12-31 | Price Manipulation , Matched Orders +1 | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Panchal Shanti Lal (alleged reversal and synchronized trades, Swan Energy, 2025) | SEBI (India) | 2025-09-17 | Matched Orders , Wash Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEBI v. Vijay Pujara and others (synchronized and circular trades, Kavit Industries, 2025) | SEBI (India) | 2025-02-28 | Matched Orders , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Rajendra D. Shah and 35 others (NIFTY index options trades, 2024) | SEBI (India) | 2024-08-30 | Matched Orders , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Jayesh Rawal and others (Generic Engineering Construction and Projects, 2023) | SEBI (India) | 2023-08-10 | Price Manipulation , Matched Orders +1 | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Divyaben Hiteshbhai Gangani and others (Kapil Raj Finance Ltd, circular trades, 2023) | SEBI (India) | 2023-06-16 | Wash Trading , Matched Orders | — | judgment |