Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Ahmad Haris Tajyar and Eric Leo Marsoubian (marking the close, 2021)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-ahmad-haris-tajyar-marking-the-close-2021) by email

In 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Ahmad Haris Tajyar and Eric Leo Marsoubian, alleging conduct this library classifies as marking the close, matched orders and wash trading. The release records a civil penalty of $219,604, disgorgement of $15,267.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-25167
Date filed 2021-08-13
Date resolved 2021-08-13
Court U.S. District Court, Central District of California
Status settled
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Bars imposed penny stock bar
Defendants Ahmad Haris Tajyar (individual) ; Eric Leo Marsoubian (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(1) ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(2) ; Securities Act s.17(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Marking the close , Matched orders , Wash trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$220k
Disgorgement
$15.3k
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$235k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on August 13, 2021 as release LR-25167. The respondents named are Ahmad Haris Tajyar and Eric Leo Marsoubian (2 individuals, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California.

This library tags the matter as marking the close, matched orders and wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $219,604, disgorgement of $15,267. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

Non-monetary relief recorded: penny stock bar.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2021-08-13 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEBI v. Usha Devi and others (price and volume manipulation of DU Digital Technologies, 2025) SEBI (India) 2025-12-31 Price Manipulation , Matched Orders +1 — judgment
SEBI v. Panchal Shanti Lal (alleged reversal and synchronized trades, Swan Energy, 2025) SEBI (India) 2025-09-17 Matched Orders , Wash Trading — dismissed
SEBI v. Vijay Pujara and others (synchronized and circular trades, Kavit Industries, 2025) SEBI (India) 2025-02-28 Matched Orders , Wash Trading — judgment
SEBI v. Rajendra D. Shah and 35 others (NIFTY index options trades, 2024) SEBI (India) 2024-08-30 Matched Orders , Wash Trading — judgment
SEBI v. Jayesh Rawal and others (Generic Engineering Construction and Projects, 2023) SEBI (India) 2023-08-10 Price Manipulation , Matched Orders +1 — judgment
SEBI v. Divyaben Hiteshbhai Gangani and others (Kapil Raj Finance Ltd, circular trades, 2023) SEBI (India) 2023-06-16 Wash Trading , Matched Orders — judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.