FCA v. Frank Cochran Individual (2020)
Status unknown
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In November 2020 the Financial Conduct Authority banned Frank Cochran from regulated financial work after a jury convicted him in 2018 of sexual assault, harassment-related and coercive-control offences for which he received seven years in prison. The notice does not concern insider dealing.
The record
| Agency | FCA |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2020-11-03 |
| Date resolved | 2020-11-03 |
| Status | unknown |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Frank Cochran Individual |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Financial Conduct Authority issued its final notice on November 3, 2020.
It records that Cochran was convicted by a jury on April 17, 2018 of sexual assault, putting a person in fear of violence and controlling or coercive behaviour, and sentenced the same day to seven years' imprisonment with an indefinite restraining order and a lifelong sex offender registration requirement. The FCA concluded he lacked the integrity needed to work in financial services and made a prohibition order.
The record had been tagged insider trading because the notice's standard guidance lists insider dealing among the offences the FCA considers; that is boilerplate, and the tag has been removed.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
Timeline
- 2020-11-03 FCA final notice
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.