Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Statoil ASA (price manipulation, 2017)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (cftc-statoil-asa-settlement-price-manipulation-2017) by email

In 2017, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Statoil ASA, alleging conduct this library classifies as price manipulation and settlement price manipulation. The release records a civil penalty of $4 million.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 7643-17
Date filed 2017-11-14
Date resolved 2017-11-14
Status settled
Asset class futures
Venue NYMEX, OTC
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Statoil ASA (entity)
Cited as charged or alleged CEA s.9(a)(2) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Price manipulation , Settlement price manipulation

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$4m
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$4m
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on November 14, 2017 as release 7643-17. The respondent named is Statoil ASA (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as price manipulation and settlement price manipulation, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against futures, with NYMEX, OTC identified in the release.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $4 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2017-11-14 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
CFTC v. Joseph F. Welsh III (price manipulation, 2015) CFTC 2015-06-19 Price Manipulation , Settlement Price Manipulation $500k judgment
CFTC v. Daniel Shak and SHK Management LLC (banging the close, 2013) CFTC 2013-11-25 Banging The Close , Price Manipulation +1 $400k settled
CFTC v. Donald R. Wilson and DRW Investments, LLC (banging the close, 2013) CFTC 2013-11-06 Banging The Close , Price Manipulation +1 — judgment
SEBI v. Shreedhar Yellaiah Kodam (synchronized trades, Well Pack Papers, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-09-22 Matched Orders , Price Manipulation — dismissed
SEBI v. Debock Industries Limited and others (fictitious issues, inflated sales and diverted rights-issue funds, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-28 Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Price Manipulation — judgment
SEBI v. Varanium Cloud Limited and others (false accounts, diverted IPO funds and share sales, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-25 Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Price Manipulation — judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.