CFTC v. Ronald Montano and Montano Enterprises LLC (binary options solicitation fraud, 2021)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2021, a Florida federal court permanently enjoined Ronald Montano and Montano Enterprises LLC and ordered US$825,000 in restitution and a US$1.675 million penalty for fraudulently soliciting customers for binary options trading.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 8425-21 |
| Date filed | 2021-09-15 |
| Date resolved | 2021-09-15 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Ronald Montano ; Montano Enterprises LLC |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $1.7m
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $1.7m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on September 15, 2021 as release 8425-21. The respondents named are Ronald Montano and Montano Enterprises LLC (1 individual, 1 entity).
The order finds that Montano used fraudulent solicitations to bring customers to binary options trading; the word "fictitious" in the release refers to the solicitation, not to a trade. No wash trading is described.
This library applies no technique tag to the matter. The conduct is solicitation fraud, not wash trading.
A $1.675 million civil monetary penalty, $825,000 in restitution, and trading and registration bans.
The court entered a permanent injunction and money judgment.
Timeline
- 2021-09-15 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.