CFTC v. Gain Capital Group, LLC (supervision failures, 2020)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2020, the CFTC settled charges against futures commission merchant Gain Capital Group, LLC, ordering a US$300,000 penalty for failing to supervise accounts introduced by Foremost Trading LLC and traded by Mark Miller, including its handling of trade-move requests.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 8263-20 |
| Date filed | 2020-09-29 |
| Date resolved | 2020-09-29 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | futures |
| Venue | CME |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Gain Capital Group, LLC |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $300k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $300k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on September 29, 2020 as release 8263-20. The respondents named are Gain Capital Group, LLC (0 individuals, 1 entity).
The order finds that from 2014 to 2016 Gain did not follow its own policy on requests to move trades between accounts and had weak procedures for reviewing customer accounts. The earlier fraud by Foremost and Miller is referenced only as background.
This library applies no technique tag to the matter. The charge is a supervision failure by a clearing firm; the release does not describe wash trading by the respondent.
A $300,000 civil monetary penalty and a cease-and-desist order under CFTC Regulation 166.3.
Gain consented to the order.
Timeline
- 2020-09-29 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.