CFTC v. Simmons, Salazar and their companies (ponzi schemes, 2015)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In July 2015 the CFTC announced consent orders in the Western District of North Carolina imposing a total of $76 million in civil penalties on Keith F. Simmons, Deanna Salazar and their companies over a forex Ponzi-style scheme. Simmons received 40 years and Salazar 4.5 years in related criminal cases.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 7205-15 |
| Date filed | 2015-07-31 |
| Date resolved | 2015-07-31 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: sentenced (Keith Simmons (40 years; convicted 2010-12-16) and Deanna Salazar (4.5 years); months shown are Simmons's), U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina |
| Sentence | 40 years |
| Defendants | Keith F. Simmons ; Black Diamond Capital Solutions, LLC ; Deanna Salazar ; Life Plus Group, LLC ; Black Diamond Holdings, LLC |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $76m
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $76m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The orders arise from a January 2011 CFTC complaint alleging fraudulent solicitation and misappropriation, and impose permanent trading and registration bans. The criminal cases produced a 40-year sentence for Simmons, recorded here as 480 months, and a 4.5-year sentence for Salazar, with $40 million in combined criminal restitution.
The record showed no penalty and a single defendant; the $76 million is the combined penalty across both sets of defendants, so it is not one person's figure.
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the document describes payments to earlier participants made from later participants' money. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2015-07-31 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |