Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Energy Broker and Its Owner (front running, 2019)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2019, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Energy Broker and Its Owner, alleging conduct this library classifies as front running. The release records a civil penalty of $1.5 million, disgorgement of $413,065.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 8030-19
Date filed 2019-10-01
Date resolved 2019-10-01
Status judgment
Asset class commodities, futures
Venue ICE
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Energy Broker (individual) ; Its Owner (individual)
Techniques Front running

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$1.5m
Disgorgement
$413k
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
$1.9m
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on October 1, 2019 as release 8030-19. The respondents named are Energy Broker and Its Owner (2 individuals, 0 entities).

This library tags the matter as front running, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against commodities and futures, with ICE identified in the release.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $1.5 million, disgorgement of $413,065. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2019-10-01 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (front running, 2023) SEC 2023-03-31 Front Running , Insider Trading settled
SEC v. Lawrence Billimek and Alan Williams (front running, 2022) SEC 2022-12-20 Front Running unknown
SEC v. Sergei Polevikov, et al. (front running, 2022) SEC 2022-08-17 Front Running dismissed
CFTC v. Block Trade Broker (front running, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-28 Front Running , Insider Trading filed
SEC v. Mizuho Securities USA LLC (front running, 2018) SEC 2018-07-23 Front Running , Insider Trading +1 settled
SEC v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (front running, 2016) SEC 2016-10-12 Front Running , Insider Trading +1 $100k judgment

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.