CFTC v. Defendants Harbor Light Asset (ponzi schemes, 2014)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2014 the CFTC announced an order against Harbor Light Asset Management and its owner Michael Jenkins for solicitation fraud and misappropriation in a Ponzi scheme, requiring $1,301,406.60 in restitution and a $3,904,219.80 civil monetary penalty.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 6855-14 |
| Date filed | 2014-02-11 |
| Date resolved | 2014-02-11 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Harbor Light Asset Management, LLC ; Michael Anthony Jenkins |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $3.9m
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $3.9m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The order, entered by an Eastern District of North Carolina judge after a complaint filed in November 2012, permanently bans both defendants from trading and registration. The earlier complaint alleged a Ponzi scheme that drew in at least $1.79 million from roughly 377 people.
The headline ("over $5.2 million") combines restitution and penalty; the record had entered $5.2 million as the penalty, and had cut the defendant name down to "Defendants Harbor Light Asset".
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the order or release describes payments to earlier participants made from later participants' money. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2014-02-11 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |