CFTC v. Coinbase Inc. (exchange wash trading, 2021)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In March 2021, the CFTC settled charges against digital asset exchange Coinbase Inc., ordering a US$6.5 million penalty for reckless false or misleading transaction reporting from its GDAX platform and for wash trading by a former employee in the Litecoin/Bitcoin pair.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 8369-21 |
| Date filed | 2021-03-19 |
| Date resolved | 2021-03-19 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | crypto, equities, futures |
| Venue | CME, Coinbase, NYSE |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Coinbase Inc. |
| Techniques | Exchange wash trading , Wash trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $6.5m
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $6.5m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on March 19, 2021 as release 8369-21. The respondents named are Coinbase Inc. (0 individuals, 1 entity).
The order finds that from January 2015 to September 2018 Coinbase ran two automated trading programs, Hedger and Replicator, whose orders sometimes matched each other, and Coinbase reported those trades to index and data providers without disclosing it traded through several accounts. The order also finds that over six weeks in August and September 2016 a former employee placed buy and sell orders in the Litecoin/Bitcoin pair that matched each other as wash trades, creating a misleading appearance of activity. Trades between Coinbase-owned accounts share one owner, so they are wash trades, not matched orders.
This library tags the matter as exchange wash trading and wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
A $6.5 million civil monetary penalty covering both sets of findings, and a cease-and-desist order.
Coinbase consented to the order.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Exchange wash trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Wash trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2021-03-19 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSC v. Coinsquare Ltd. and others (exchange wash trading, 2020) | OSC | 2020-07-17 | Exchange Wash Trading , Wash Trading | — | settled |
| SEC v. Gotbit Consulting LLC a/k/a Gotbit Hedge Fund and Fedor Kedrov (paid crypto market making, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-03 | Paid Crypto Market Making , Wash Trading | — | settled |
| SEC v. Justin Sun, Tron Foundation Limited, BitTorrent Foundation Ltd., Rainberry, Inc., and DeAndre Cortez Way (wash trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-03-05 | Wash Trading | $10m | settled |
| SEBI v. Usha Devi and others (price and volume manipulation of DU Digital Technologies, 2025) | SEBI (India) | 2025-12-31 | Price Manipulation , Matched Orders +1 | — | judgment |
| Victorian man sentenced in market manipulation case (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-12-12 | Price Manipulation , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Indra Pratap Gajraj Singh (Octant Interactive Technologies circular trading, remand dismissal, 2025) | SEBI (India) | 2025-11-27 | Wash Trading , Price Manipulation | — | dismissed |