Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Cipolla (ponzi schemes, 2021)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (cftc-cipolla-ponzi-schemes-2021) by email

In May 2021 the CFTC announced a Virginia federal court consent order requiring Leonard Cipolla to pay $5,102,283.51 in restitution for a futures and options pool fraud and imposing trading and registration bans.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 8388-21
Date filed 2021-05-14
Date resolved 2021-05-14
Court U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Status judgment
Criminal parallel Yes: sentenced (Cipolla), U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, 2020-07-01
Sentence 10y 1m
Defendants Leonard J. Cipolla (individual)
Techniques Ponzi schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

Cipolla admitted that from 2009 to 2019 he took about $7.1 million from pool participants, put only about $1.46 million into trading accounts, diverted over $2.5 million to business and personal spending, and sent more than $3 million back to participants as Ponzi-style payouts.

The order imposes restitution and no penalty. The record had entered the $5 million headline figure as a penalty, and listed the defendant by surname only.

This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the order or release describes payments to earlier participants made from later participants' money. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2021-05-14 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2019-09-19 CFTC CFTC v. Trader and his Company (ponzi schemes, 2019) Settled
2021-05-14 CFTC CFTC v. Cipolla (ponzi schemes, 2021)(this record) Judgment entered

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Ponzi Schemes — settled
SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-13 Ponzi Schemes — filed
CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-07-24 Ponzi Schemes $449k judgment
CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-07-07 Ponzi Schemes — filed

Record added September 20, 2026. submit a correction.