CFTC v. Swapnil Rege and SwapStar Capital LLC (ponzi schemes, 2022)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2022 the CFTC announced a judgment against Swapnil Rege and SwapStar Capital LLC. A final judgment on consent finds that the defendants fraudulently solicited lenders and investors with promised fixed returns of up to 60%, misappropriated funds, paid other account holders in a manner akin to a Ponzi scheme, and that Rege breached an earlier CFTC consent order. It imposes permanent trading and registration bans, $4,894,225 in disgorgement (joint and several with relief defendant Reema Rege, limited to specified account balances), $161,335 of prejudgment interest and a $200,000 penalty.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 8579-22 |
| Date filed | 2022-09-02 |
| Date resolved | 2022-09-02 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Swapnil Rege ; SwapStar Capital LLC |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $200k
- Disgorgement
- $4.9m
- Prejudgment interest
- $161k
- Total relief
- $5.3m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on September 2, 2022 as release 8579-22. A final judgment on consent finds that the defendants fraudulently solicited lenders and investors with promised fixed returns of up to 60%, misappropriated funds, paid other account holders in a manner akin to a Ponzi scheme, and that Rege breached an earlier CFTC consent order. It imposes permanent trading and registration bans, $4,894,225 in disgorgement (joint and several with relief defendant Reema Rege, limited to specified account balances), $161,335 of prejudgment interest and a $200,000 penalty.
This library tags the matter as a Ponzi scheme because the document describes returns to earlier investors paid from later investors' money, as alleged or found. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil penalty of $200,000, disgorgement of $4,894,225, prejudgment interest of $161,335, as the release or order states it. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2022-09-02 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-27 | CFTC | CFTC v. Swapnil Rege and SwapStar Capital LLC (2021) | Settled |
| 2022-09-02 | CFTC | CFTC v. Swapnil Rege and SwapStar Capital LLC (ponzi schemes, 2022) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |