ASIC v. Dylan Rands (price manipulation, 2021)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2021 ASIC banned former Regal Funds Management dealer and portfolio manager Dylan Rands from providing financial services for five years after finding he made 112 uncommercial trades creating an artificial price in Clearview Wealth shares between December 2018 and June 2019 and created a false appearance of active trading on two dates. He may seek Administrative Appeals Tribunal review.
The record
| Agency | ASIC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 21-253MR |
| Date filed | 2021-09-22 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Dylan Rands |
| Techniques | Price manipulation |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission announced this matter on September 22, 2021 as release 21-253MR. The respondents named are Dylan Rands (1 individual, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as price manipulation, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Price manipulation — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2021-09-22 ASIC media release
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTC v. George Santos (price manipulation, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-31 | Price Manipulation | $17.5k | settled |
| Victorian man sentenced in market manipulation case (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-12-12 | Price Manipulation , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| ASIC v. Delta Power & Energy (Vales Point) Pty Ltd (price manipulation, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-06-30 | Price Manipulation , Marking The Close | — | filed |
| Victorian man charged over alleged market manipulation (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-03-14 | Price Manipulation , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Marco Babini, et al. (price manipulation, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-27 | Price Manipulation | — | judgment |
| CFTC v. TOTSA TotalEnergies Trading SA (price manipulation, 2024) | CFTC | 2024-08-27 | Price Manipulation | $48m | settled |