Former Big Un CEO pleads guilty in insider trading case (ASIC, 2026)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In April 2026 ASIC announced that Richard Evans, formerly Evertz, former chief executive of the collapsed ASX-listed Big Un, pleaded guilty in the Sydney District Court to one charge of communicating inside information to a shareholder around 10 January 2017 about customer numbers for its promotional package and a $20 million funding arrangement. The trial was vacated; sentencing was part heard on 21 August 2026 and adjourned to 25 September 2026.
The record
| Agency | ASIC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 26-069MR |
| Date filed | 2026-04-09 |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: guilty plea (Richard Evans (sentencing hearing listed for 21 August 2026)), Sydney District Court |
| Defendants | Richard Evans (formerly Evertz) |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Corporations Act s.1043A |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission announced the plea in release 26-069MR; the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions prosecutes after ASIC's referral.
The offence is communicating inside information where the recipient was likely to trade, not trading by Evans. No sentence is recorded.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2026-04-09 ASIC media release
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-14 | ASIC | Former CEO of Big Un Limited charged with insider trading (ASIC, 2023) | Judgment entered |
| 2026-04-09 | ASIC | Former Big Un CEO pleads guilty in insider trading case (ASIC, 2026) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |
| SEC v. Jamal (“Jimmy”) Chammout and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-17 | Insider Trading | $776k | filed |