AMF France v. Biosynex and others (insider trading, 2024)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 5, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the French decision; an independent second reading of 60 of the AMF records agreed on every field for 54 and on the core fields for 59. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In July 2024 the Commission des sanctions fined the diagnostics company Biosynex, four of its directors and three of their holding companies a combined EUR 930,000. The directors sold shares in April 2020 knowing the company was about to sell all its own treasury shares, and the company failed to circulate information about Covid-19 tests that its chief executive had given to a journalist.
The record
| Agency | AMF (France) |
|---|---|
| Release number | SAN-2024-08 |
| Date filed | 2024-07-25 |
| Date resolved | 2024-07-25 |
| Court | Commission des sanctions (AMF, France) |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Instruments | Biosynex shares |
| Venue | Euronext Growth |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Biosynex ; Larry Abensur ; ALA Financière ; Thierry Paper ; Axodev ; Thomas Lamy ; AJT Financière ; Elie Fraenckel |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- €930k
What is alleged to have happened
The Commission des sanctions of the AMF, first section, decided the matter on 25 July 2024. The respondents are Biosynex, listed on Euronext Growth, its founder-directors Larry Abensur, Thierry Paper and Thomas Lamy, their holding companies ALA Financière, Axodev and AJT Financière, and Elie Fraenckel.
The notifications alleged that the planned sale by Biosynex of a block of 434,000 treasury shares was inside information, that the directors and their companies sold shares between 7 and 17 April 2020 while holding it, and that several reported their trades late. They also alleged that Biosynex and Mr Abensur failed to circulate fully and effectively information on the imminent launch of Covid-19 tests that he gave a journalist on 20 March 2020.
The Commission upheld each of these charges. It found that each individual held the information about the sale of all of Biosynex's treasury shares and used it in selling, among them 50,597 shares by Mr Abensur personally and 52,102 through ALA Financière, 82,500 by Mr Paper personally and 50,000 through Axodev, 26,000 through AJT Financière and 31,800 by Mr Fraenckel. It also upheld the late-reporting charges against Mr Abensur, Mr Lamy, Mr Fraenckel and the two holding companies concerned.
The fines were EUR 50,000 on Biosynex, 160,000 on Mr Abensur, 300,000 on ALA Financière, 150,000 on Mr Paper, 80,000 on Axodev, 50,000 on Mr Lamy, 70,000 on AJT Financière and 70,000 on Mr Fraenckel. Publication was ordered without anonymisation.
The record does not show the price effect, the profits or losses avoided, whether any respondent appealed, or any criminal case.
This library tags the matter as insider trading. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the decision.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2024-07-25 Commission des sanctions decision
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |