Market Manipulation. Search

AMF France v. Y, A, B, D and C (insider trading, 2020)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 5, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the French decision; an independent second reading of 60 of the AMF records agreed on every field for 54 and on the core fields for 59. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (amf-fr-san-2020-11-insider-trading-2020) by email

On 13 November 2020 the Commission des sanctions found that three individuals bought shares of the company behind Grand Marnier in February and March 2016 using inside information about a family stake sale likely to lead to a takeover bid, and that two others passed the information on. It fined the five between EUR 25,000 and EUR 100,000 each, EUR 275,000 in total.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency AMF (France)
Release number SAN-2020-11
Date filed 2020-11-13
Date resolved 2020-11-13
Court Commission des sanctions (AMF, France)
Status judgment
Asset class equities
Instruments Shares of Société des Produits Marnier Lapostolle (Grand Marnier)
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Y (individual) ; A (individual) ; B (individual) ; D (individual) ; C (individual)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—
Penalty as published
€275k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars. This regulator states penalties in EUR. The figure is recorded as published and is not converted, so it does not appear in the USD totals or medians used elsewhere on this site.

What is alleged to have happened

The Commission des sanctions of the Autorité des marchés financiers (first section) decided the case on 13 November 2020, after a hearing on 28 September. The AMF had opened its inquiry into the shares in July 2016, and notifications of grievances, with Italian translations for two respondents, were sent in January 2019 to five individuals.

The notifications alleged that information about a planned sale by a family group of a stake in Société des Produits Marnier Lapostolle (SPML), likely to lead to a follow-on bid, was inside information from 26 January 2016. Y, D and A were accused of using it when buying shares on 8 February, 23 and 24 February, and 4 to 11 March 2016. B was accused of passing it to Y, and C of passing it to A.

The Commission found each charge made out. Its findings turned on the timing and unusual character of the purchases, the personal links between the people involved and weak explanations, which together it treated as proving possession and use. It found D's inclusion on an insiders list had not been shown to be known to him, and so did not rely on it.

It fined A EUR 100,000, Y EUR 50,000, B EUR 50,000, C EUR 50,000 and D EUR 25,000, and ordered publication on the AMF website for five years, non-anonymised.

This record does not show the profits made, the identity of the source, or whether the decision was appealed.

This library tags the matter as insider trading. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the decision.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2020-11-13 Commission des sanctions decision

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled

Record added October 5, 2026. submit a correction.