Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. John W. Pauciulo, Esq. (undisclosed control blocks, 2022)

Settled

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with John W. Pauciulo, Esq., alleging conduct this library classifies as undisclosed control blocks. The release records a civil penalty of $490,000. A parallel criminal matter is referenced in the release.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 3-20926
Date filed 2022-07-07
Date resolved 2022-07-07
Status settled
Criminal parallel Yes
Defendants John W. Pauciulo, Esq. (individual)
Techniques Undisclosed control blocks

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$490k
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$490k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on July 7, 2022 as release 3-20926. The respondents named are John W. Pauciulo, Esq. (1 individual, 0 entities).

This library tags the matter as undisclosed control blocks, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $490,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2022-07-07 Administrative proceeding instituted (102e)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Airborne Wireless Network and others (pump and dump, 2025) SEC 2025-02-07 Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks — judgment
SEC v. Wells Real Estate Investment, LLC, Janalie C. Joseph a/k/a Janalie C. Bingham, and Jean Joseph, et al. (ponzi schemes, 2024) SEC 2024-08-20 Ponzi Schemes , Undisclosed Control Blocks — unknown
SEC v. Damon R. Durante (undisclosed control blocks, 2023) SEC 2023-06-30 Undisclosed Control Blocks — unknown
SEC v. William Andrew Stack, Esq. (undisclosed control blocks, 2023) SEC 2023-03-31 Undisclosed Control Blocks , Unregistered Distributions $333k judgment
SEC v. Jillian Sidoti (undisclosed control blocks, 2022) SEC 2022-05-17 Undisclosed Control Blocks $22k judgment
SEC v. TKO Farms, Inc., et al. (undisclosed control blocks, 2022) SEC 2022-05-09 Undisclosed Control Blocks — filed

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.