Market Manipulation. Search

This action was dismissed. The allegations described below were not established. This page is kept online so that the outcome is visible alongside the original filing.

SEC v. Diane D. Dalmy, Esq. (pump and dump, 2016)

Dismissed

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action, since dismissed, against Diane D. Dalmy, Esq., alleging conduct this library classifies as pump and dump, reverse merger schemes and unregistered distributions. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 3-17020
Date filed 2016-07-29
Date resolved 2016-07-29
Court SEC administrative law judge
Status dismissed
Asset class equities
Venue OTC
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Diane D. Dalmy, Esq. (individual)
Techniques Pump and dump , Reverse merger schemes , Unregistered distributions

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
$4.4m

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on July 29, 2016 as release 3-17020. The respondents named are Diane D. Dalmy, Esq. (1 individual, 0 entities). The action was brought in the SEC administrative law judge.

This library tags the matter as pump and dump, reverse merger schemes and unregistered distributions, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities, with OTC identified in the release.

The action was dismissed. We keep dismissed matters in the library precisely so that the outcome is visible alongside the original allegation.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2016-07-29 Initial decision

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Ongkaruck Sripetch, et al. (pump and dump, 2025) SEC 2025-06-20 Pump And Dump , Unregistered Distributions — dismissed
SEC v. DiScala et al., (pump and dump, 2024) SEC 2024-09-20 Pump And Dump , Reverse Merger Schemes — judgment
SEC v. Charles Parkinson Lloyd (reverse merger schemes, 2021) SEC 2021-09-15 Reverse Merger Schemes , Unregistered Distributions $40k settled
SEC v. Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq. (pump and dump, 2020) SEC 2020-01-23 Pump And Dump , Reverse Merger Schemes +1 — unknown
SEC v. S. Paul Kelley, et al. (reverse merger schemes, 2019) SEC 2019-12-20 Reverse Merger Schemes , Unregistered Distributions — unknown
SEC v. Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc. (paid stock promotion, 2019) SEC 2019-05-15 Paid Stock Promotion , Pump And Dump +1 $300k settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.