SEC v. Diane D. Dalmy, Esq. (pump and dump, 2016)
Dismissed
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action, since dismissed, against Diane D. Dalmy, Esq., alleging conduct this library classifies as pump and dump, reverse merger schemes and unregistered distributions. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-17020 |
| Date filed | 2016-07-29 |
| Date resolved | 2016-07-29 |
| Court | SEC administrative law judge |
| Status | dismissed |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | OTC |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Diane D. Dalmy, Esq. |
| Techniques | Pump and dump , Reverse merger schemes , Unregistered distributions |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- $4.4m
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on July 29, 2016 as release 3-17020. The respondents named are Diane D. Dalmy, Esq. (1 individual, 0 entities). The action was brought in the SEC administrative law judge.
This library tags the matter as pump and dump, reverse merger schemes and unregistered distributions, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities, with OTC identified in the release.
The action was dismissed. We keep dismissed matters in the library precisely so that the outcome is visible alongside the original allegation.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Pump and dump — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Reverse merger schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Unregistered distributions — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2016-07-29 Initial decision
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Ongkaruck Sripetch, et al. (pump and dump, 2025) | SEC | 2025-06-20 | Pump And Dump , Unregistered Distributions | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. DiScala et al., (pump and dump, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-20 | Pump And Dump , Reverse Merger Schemes | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Charles Parkinson Lloyd (reverse merger schemes, 2021) | SEC | 2021-09-15 | Reverse Merger Schemes , Unregistered Distributions | $40k | settled |
| SEC v. Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq. (pump and dump, 2020) | SEC | 2020-01-23 | Pump And Dump , Reverse Merger Schemes +1 | — | unknown |
| SEC v. S. Paul Kelley, et al. (reverse merger schemes, 2019) | SEC | 2019-12-20 | Reverse Merger Schemes , Unregistered Distributions | — | unknown |
| SEC v. Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc. (paid stock promotion, 2019) | SEC | 2019-05-15 | Paid Stock Promotion , Pump And Dump +1 | $300k | settled |