FCA v. Jeremy Kraft (benchmark submission rigging, 2015)
Settled
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2015, the Financial Conduct Authority settled an action with Jeremy Kraft, alleging conduct this library classifies as benchmark submission rigging, cash vs derivatives schemes, price manipulation and wash trading. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.
The record
| Agency | FCA |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2015-01-22 |
| Date resolved | 2015-01-22 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | bonds |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Jeremy Kraft |
| Techniques | Benchmark submission rigging , Cash versus derivatives schemes , Price manipulation , Wash trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- £105k
What is alleged to have happened
the Financial Conduct Authority announced this matter on January 22, 2015. The respondents named are Jeremy Kraft (1 individual, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as benchmark submission rigging, cash vs derivatives schemes, price manipulation and wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against bonds.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 4 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Benchmark submission rigging — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Cash versus derivatives schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Price manipulation — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Wash trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2015-01-22 FCA final notice
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCA v. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (benchmark submission rigging, 2013) | FCA | 2013-02-06 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes +2 | — | settled |
| CFTC v. unnamed respondents (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2022) | CFTC | 2022-10-20 | Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Exchange Wash Trading +4 | $41m | judgment |
| FCA v. Neil Danziger (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | FCA | 2018-01-08 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes +1 | — | unknown |
| CFTC v. Navinder Sarao (benchmark submission rigging, 2015) | CFTC | 2015-11-07 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Ponzi Schemes +3 | $1.6m | judgment |
| FCA v. David Caplin (benchmark submission rigging, 2015) | FCA | 2015-01-22 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation +1 | — | settled |
| CFTC v. Lloyds Banking Group and Lloyds Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2014) | CFTC | 2014-07-29 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes +1 | $105m | judgment |