Market Manipulation. Search

FCA v. Jeremy Kraft (benchmark submission rigging, 2015)

Settled

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2015, the Financial Conduct Authority settled an action with Jeremy Kraft, alleging conduct this library classifies as benchmark submission rigging, cash vs derivatives schemes, price manipulation and wash trading. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency FCA
Date filed 2015-01-22
Date resolved 2015-01-22
Status settled
Asset class bonds
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Jeremy Kraft (individual)
Techniques Benchmark submission rigging , Cash versus derivatives schemes , Price manipulation , Wash trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
Disgorgement
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
Alleged gain
Penalty as published
£105k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars. This regulator states penalties in GBP. The figure is recorded as published and is not converted, so it does not appear in the USD totals or medians used elsewhere on this site.

What is alleged to have happened

the Financial Conduct Authority announced this matter on January 22, 2015. The respondents named are Jeremy Kraft (1 individual, 0 entities).

This library tags the matter as benchmark submission rigging, cash vs derivatives schemes, price manipulation and wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against bonds.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 4 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2015-01-22 FCA final notice

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
FCA v. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (benchmark submission rigging, 2013) FCA 2013-02-06 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes +2 settled
CFTC v. unnamed respondents (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2022) CFTC 2022-10-20 Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Exchange Wash Trading +4 $41m judgment
FCA v. Neil Danziger (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) FCA 2018-01-08 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes +1 unknown
CFTC v. Navinder Sarao (benchmark submission rigging, 2015) CFTC 2015-11-07 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Ponzi Schemes +3 $1.6m judgment
FCA v. David Caplin (benchmark submission rigging, 2015) FCA 2015-01-22 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation +1 settled
CFTC v. Lloyds Banking Group and Lloyds Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2014) CFTC 2014-07-29 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes +1 $105m judgment

Record added September 9, 2026. submit a correction.