FCA v. Edward John Booth (churning, 2018)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2018, the Financial Conduct Authority obtained a judgment against Edward John Booth, over an unrelated credit-broker fraud.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency	FCA
Date filed	2018-07-25
Date resolved	2018-07-25
Status	judgment
Criminal parallel	No
Defendants	Edward John Booth (individual)
Techniques

What was ordered

Civil penalty: —
Disgorgement: —
Prejudgment interest: —
Total relief: —
Alleged gain: —

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Financial Conduct Authority announced this matter on July 25, 2018. The respondents named are Edward John Booth (1 individual, 0 entities).

This notice concerns an unrelated credit-broker fraud. Its one use of "churning" is Booth's own metaphor, quoted from an interview, about "churning people's information round and round" — not a finding that he churned any account. This library does not tag the matter with any technique.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

Timeline

2018-07-25 FCA final notice

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

FCA final notice

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.