CFTC v. FTX (exchange wash trading, 2024)
Judgment entered
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against FTX, alleging conduct this library classifies as exchange wash trading, insider trading, ponzi schemes, spoofing and wash trading. The release records disgorgement of $14.5 billion.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 9011-24 |
| Date filed | 2024-12-04 |
| Date resolved | 2024-12-04 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | commodities, crypto, futures |
| Venue | Binance, CBOT, CME, ICE |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | FTX |
| Techniques | Exchange wash trading , Insider trading , Ponzi schemes , Spoofing , Wash trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $14.5bn
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $14.5bn
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on December 4, 2024 as release 9011-24. The respondents named are FTX (0 individuals, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as exchange wash trading, insider trading, ponzi schemes, spoofing and wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against commodities and crypto and futures, with Binance, CBOT, CME, ICE identified in the release.
The relief recorded in our data is disgorgement of $14.5 billion. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 5 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Exchange wash trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Spoofing — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Wash trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2024-12-04 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTC v. unnamed respondents (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2022) | CFTC | 2022-10-20 | Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Exchange Wash Trading +4 | $41m | judgment |
| CFTC v. Navinder Sarao (benchmark submission rigging, 2015) | CFTC | 2015-11-07 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Ponzi Schemes +3 | $1.6m | judgment |
| CFTC v. UBS (benchmark submission rigging, 2013) | CFTC | 2013-10-25 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Ponzi Schemes +2 | $1.5m | settled |
| CFTC v. unnamed respondents (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-02-25 | Insider Trading , Wash Trading | — | settled |
| CFTC v. Gregg Smith (spoofing, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-01-16 | Spoofing , Wash Trading | $200k | judgment |
| SEC v. SpeedRoute LLC (layering, 2025) | SEC | 2025-01-10 | Layering , Pump And Dump +2 | — | settled |