Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2017)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2017, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Citigroup Global Markets Inc., alleging conduct this library classifies as cash vs derivatives schemes and spoofing. The release records a civil penalty of $25 million.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 7516-17
Date filed 2017-01-19
Date resolved 2017-01-19
Status judgment
Asset class futures
Venue CME
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (entity)
Techniques Cash versus derivatives schemes , Spoofing

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$25m
Disgorgement
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
$25m
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on January 19, 2017 as release 7516-17. The respondents named are Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as cash vs derivatives schemes and spoofing, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against futures, with CME identified in the release.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $25 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2017-01-19 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. TD Securities (USA) LLC (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2024) SEC 2024-09-30 Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Spoofing unknown
CFTC v. HSBC Bank USA (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2023) CFTC 2023-11-07 Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Insider Trading +2 $1.7bn filed
CFTC v. unnamed respondents (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2022) CFTC 2022-10-20 Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Exchange Wash Trading +4 $41m judgment
CFTC v. Tennessee Trader and Two Entities (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2022) CFTC 2022-04-14 Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Spoofing unknown
SEC v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2020) SEC 2020-09-29 Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Layering +1 filed
CFTC v. Futures Trader and Trading Firm (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-19 Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Spoofing $1.8m judgment

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.