SEC v. Mark Alan Bourgeois (undisclosed control blocks, 2022)
Alleged — pending
These are allegations. SEC has filed an action; nothing in it has been proven, and the respondents have not been found liable. Everything described on this page is what the regulator alleges, not what a court has found. See our editorial policy.
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action against Mark Alan Bourgeois, alleging conduct this library classifies as undisclosed control blocks. The release records disgorgement of $2.0 million, prejudgment interest of $106,682.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-20786 |
| Date filed | 2022-03-02 |
| Status | filed |
| Asset class | bonds |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | registration bar |
| Defendants | Mark Alan Bourgeois |
| Techniques | Undisclosed control blocks |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $2m
- Prejudgment interest
- $107k
- Total relief
- $2.1m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on March 2, 2022 as release 3-20786. The respondents named are Mark Alan Bourgeois (1 individual, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as undisclosed control blocks, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against bonds.
The relief recorded in our data is disgorgement of $2.0 million, prejudgment interest of $106,682. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
Non-monetary relief recorded: registration bar.
This matter is at the allegation stage. Nothing in the regulator's filing has been proven, and the respondents are entitled to the presumption that it has not been. This page will be updated if the matter is resolved, dismissed or withdrawn.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Undisclosed control blocks — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Airborne Wireless Network and others (pump and dump, 2025) | SEC | 2025-02-07 | Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Adage Capital Management, L.P. (undisclosed control blocks, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-25 | Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | settled |
| SEC v. Alphabet Inc. (undisclosed control blocks, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-25 | Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | settled |
| SEC v. David L. Kanen (undisclosed control blocks, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-25 | Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | settled |
| SEC v. Essex Woodlands Management, Inc. (undisclosed control blocks, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-25 | Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | settled |
| SEC v. Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. (undisclosed control blocks, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-25 | Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | settled |