SEC v. Dohan + Company CPA and others (wash trading, 2011)
Dismissed
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action, since dismissed, against Dohan + Company CPA and 4 others, alleging conduct this library classifies as wash trading. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-13997 |
| Date filed | 2011-06-27 |
| Date resolved | 2011-06-27 |
| Court | SEC administrative law judge |
| Status | dismissed |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Dohan + Company CPA ; Steven H. Dohan, CPA ; Nancy L. Brown, CPA ; and Erez Bahar ; CA |
| Techniques | Wash trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on June 27, 2011 as release 3-13997. The respondents named are Dohan + Company CPA and 4 others (4 individuals, 1 entity). The action was brought in the SEC administrative law judge.
This library tags the matter as wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The action was dismissed. We keep dismissed matters in the library precisely so that the outcome is visible alongside the original allegation.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Wash trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2011-06-27 Initial decision
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Gotbit Consulting LLC a/k/a Gotbit Hedge Fund and Fedor Kedrov (paid crypto market making, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-03 | Paid Crypto Market Making , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Canaccord Genuity LLC (marking the close, 2026) | SEC | 2026-03-06 | Marking The Close , Marking The Open +2 | — | settled |
| SEC v. Justin Sun, Tron Foundation Limited, BitTorrent Foundation Ltd., Rainberry, Inc., and DeAndre Cortez Way (paid stock promotion, 2026) | SEC | 2026-03-05 | Paid Stock Promotion , Wash Trading | $10m | judgment |
| CFTC v. unnamed respondents (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-02-25 | Insider Trading , Wash Trading | — | settled |
| CFTC v. Gregg Smith (spoofing, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-01-16 | Spoofing , Wash Trading | $200k | judgment |
| Victorian man sentenced in market manipulation case (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-12-12 | Insider Trading , Price Manipulation +1 | — | judgment |