Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Athena Capital Research, LLC (options expiry pinning, 2014)

Settled

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Athena Capital Research, LLC, alleging conduct this library classifies as options expiry pinning. The release records a civil penalty of $1 million.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 3-16199
Date filed 2014-10-16
Date resolved 2014-10-16
Status settled
Asset class equities
Venue Nasdaq
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Athena Capital Research, LLC (entity)
Techniques Options expiry pinning

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$1m
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$1m
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on October 16, 2014 as release 3-16199. The respondents named are Athena Capital Research, LLC (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as options expiry pinning, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities, with Nasdaq identified in the release.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $1 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2014-10-16 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.