CFTC v. New Jersey Firm (wash trading, 2020)
Judgment entered
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2020, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against New Jersey Firm, alleging conduct this library classifies as wash trading. The release records a civil penalty of $300,000.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 8263-20 |
| Date filed | 2020-09-29 |
| Date resolved | 2020-09-29 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | futures |
| Venue | CME |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | New Jersey Firm |
| Techniques | Wash trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $300k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $300k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on September 29, 2020 as release 8263-20. The respondents named are New Jersey Firm (1 individual, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against futures, with CME identified in the release.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $300,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Wash trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2020-09-29 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Gotbit Consulting LLC a/k/a Gotbit Hedge Fund and Fedor Kedrov (wash trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-03 | Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Canaccord Genuity LLC (marking the close, 2026) | SEC | 2026-03-06 | Marking The Close , Marking The Open +2 | — | settled |
| SEC v. Justin Sun, Tron Foundation Limited, BitTorrent Foundation Ltd., Rainberry, Inc., and DeAndre Cortez Way (paid stock promotion, 2026) | SEC | 2026-03-05 | Paid Stock Promotion , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| CFTC v. unnamed respondents (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-02-25 | Insider Trading , Wash Trading | — | settled |
| CFTC v. Gregg Smith (spoofing, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-01-16 | Spoofing , Wash Trading | $200k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Shinhan Securities Co. Ltd. (wash trading, 2025) | CFTC | 2025-09-17 | Wash Trading | $213k | judgment |