Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Jimmy Gale Watson (pump and dump, 2022)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2022, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Jimmy Gale Watson, alleging conduct this library classifies as pump and dump. The release records a civil penalty of $290,000. A parallel criminal matter is referenced in the release.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 8558-22
Date filed 2022-07-18
Date resolved 2022-07-18
Status judgment
Asset class crypto
Criminal parallel Yes
Bars imposed trading ban
Defendants Jimmy Gale Watson (individual)
Techniques Pump and dump

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$290k
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$290k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on July 18, 2022 as release 8558-22. The respondents named are Jimmy Gale Watson (1 individual, 0 entities).

This library tags the matter as pump and dump, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against crypto.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $290,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

Non-monetary relief recorded: trading ban.

The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2022-07-18 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Michael J. Forster (pump and dump, 2026) SEC 2026-07-15 Pump And Dump — judgment
SEC v. Geoffrey Allen Wall (pump and dump, 2026) SEC 2026-04-09 Pump And Dump — judgment
SEC v. Canaccord Genuity LLC (marking the close, 2026) SEC 2026-03-06 Marking The Close , Marking The Open +2 — settled
SEC v. Saeid Jaberian (pump and dump, 2026) SEC 2026-01-27 Pump And Dump — judgment
Market riggers sentenced in ASX ‘pump and dump’ case (ASIC, 2025) ASIC 2025-12-22 Chat Group Pumps , Pump And Dump — unknown
SEC v. George John Drazenovic (pump and dump, 2025) SEC 2025-12-19 Pump And Dump — judgment

Record added September 20, 2026. submit a correction.