Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Advanced Trading Workshop (newsletter scalping, 2016)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2016, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Advanced Trading Workshop, alleging conduct this library classifies as newsletter scalping and paid stock promotion. The release records a civil penalty of $470,000, disgorgement of $470,000.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 7453-16
Date filed 2016-09-28
Date resolved 2016-09-28
Status judgment
Asset class futures
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Advanced Trading Workshop (entity)
Techniques Newsletter scalping , Paid stock promotion

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$470k
Disgorgement
$470k
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
$940k
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on September 28, 2016 as release 7453-16. The respondents named are Advanced Trading Workshop (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as newsletter scalping and paid stock promotion, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against futures.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $470,000, disgorgement of $470,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2016-09-28 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. John David McAfee and Jimmy Gale Watson, Jr. (newsletter scalping, 2022) SEC 2022-07-15 Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion judgment
SEC v. Brian Robert Sodi, et al. (newsletter scalping, 2019) SEC 2019-09-19 Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion +1 settled
SEC v. SeeThruEquity, LLC et al. (newsletter scalping, 2018) SEC 2018-11-08 Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion filed
SEC v. Micheal A. Skerry (newsletter scalping, 2017) SEC 2017-09-29 Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion +1 $100k judgment
SEC v. Joey Giamichael and Umbrella Research, LLC (newsletter scalping, 2017) SEC 2017-07-25 Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion settled
SEC v. Gary S. Williky (insider trading, 2015) SEC 2015-03-02 Insider Trading , Newsletter Scalping +3 settled

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.