CFTC v. Advanced Trading Workshop (newsletter scalping, 2016)
Judgment entered
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2016, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Advanced Trading Workshop, alleging conduct this library classifies as newsletter scalping and paid stock promotion. The release records a civil penalty of $470,000, disgorgement of $470,000.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 7453-16 |
| Date filed | 2016-09-28 |
| Date resolved | 2016-09-28 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | futures |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Advanced Trading Workshop |
| Techniques | Newsletter scalping , Paid stock promotion |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $470k
- Disgorgement
- $470k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $940k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on September 28, 2016 as release 7453-16. The respondents named are Advanced Trading Workshop (0 individuals, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as newsletter scalping and paid stock promotion, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against futures.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $470,000, disgorgement of $470,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Newsletter scalping — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Paid stock promotion — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2016-09-28 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. John David McAfee and Jimmy Gale Watson, Jr. (newsletter scalping, 2022) | SEC | 2022-07-15 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Brian Robert Sodi, et al. (newsletter scalping, 2019) | SEC | 2019-09-19 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion +1 | — | settled |
| SEC v. SeeThruEquity, LLC et al. (newsletter scalping, 2018) | SEC | 2018-11-08 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion | — | filed |
| SEC v. Micheal A. Skerry (newsletter scalping, 2017) | SEC | 2017-09-29 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion +1 | $100k | judgment |
| SEC v. Joey Giamichael and Umbrella Research, LLC (newsletter scalping, 2017) | SEC | 2017-07-25 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion | — | settled |
| SEC v. Gary S. Williky (insider trading, 2015) | SEC | 2015-03-02 | Insider Trading , Newsletter Scalping +3 | — | settled |