Market Manipulation. Search

ASIC v. UBS Securities (front running, 2017)

Status unknown

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2017, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission brought an action against UBS Securities, alleging conduct this library classifies as front running. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency ASIC
Release number 17-185MR
Date filed 2017-06-15
Status unknown
Criminal parallel No
Defendants UBS Securities (entity)
Techniques Front running

What was ordered

Civil penalty
Disgorgement
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Australian Securities and Investments Commission announced this matter on June 15, 2017 as release 17-185MR. The respondents named are UBS Securities (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as front running, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2017-06-15 ASIC media release

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (front running, 2023) SEC 2023-03-31 Front Running , Insider Trading settled
SEC v. Lawrence Billimek and Alan Williams (front running, 2022) SEC 2022-12-20 Front Running unknown
SEC v. Sergei Polevikov, et al. (front running, 2022) SEC 2022-08-17 Front Running dismissed
CFTC v. Energy Broker and Its Owner (front running, 2019) CFTC 2019-10-01 Front Running $1.5m judgment
OSC v. Royal Bank of Canada (front running, 2019) OSC 2019-08-26 Front Running , FX Fixing +3 settled
OSC v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2019) OSC 2019-08-26 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Front Running +3 settled

Record added September 9, 2026. submit a correction.